🔗 Share this article

An informant has disclosed the Afghan leak inquiry that the UK abandoned sensitive equipment enabling the Taliban to identify local individuals who worked with allied troops.

Data Breach Endangers Thousands at Risk

The source, called Person A, stated that people concerned by the data leak were advised to relocate and change their contact details to protect themselves from the ruling authorities.

MPs are looking into the UK government's management of a catastrophic breach of private information involving almost nineteen thousand Afghans who had requested to move to the UK to avoid the Taliban.

Data Disclosure Was Discovered

An electronic document with their personal data, including names, addresses and sometimes relative details, was inadvertently disclosed by a worker working at UK special forces headquarters in last year.

The leak came to light in late 2023, when identities of multiple applicants who had applied to relocate to the UK were posted on social media.

Taliban Capabilities

“There seems to be this misconception that militant forces do not have similar capabilities that allied forces use,” the whistleblower testified to the committee.

“We left it all behind in Afghanistan; it's in their hands. Once they acquire your phone number, they can trace you down to within metres. That is what intelligence groups achieved.”

When questioned about whether the Taliban possessed sophisticated technology, the source declared: “They possess all resources.”

Aftermath of the Data Breach

Initial findings presented to the committee suggested that no fewer than forty-nine relatives and co-workers of individuals impacted by the leak had been killed.

A legal restriction concerning the leak was enacted in last year and restricted all details about it from being made public until mid-2025.

Security Recommendations

Due to legal constraints, the whistleblower and the volunteer organization she was working with informed individuals at risk they were assisting that they had “suspicions that somebody's phone had been compromised”.

“We recommended that they moved where feasible and changed their mobile numbers. These represented the primary information that, if authorities acquired these details, would lead to them being traced,” Person A explained.

Contested Findings

Person A disputed that internal investigation conducted by a retired civil servant had been wrong to conclude that the acquisition of the information by the regime was “not significantly alter an individual's existing exposure”.

“The thing to remember is that affected people are not confronting the authorities; they remain concealed. All concerns relate to former occupations.”

Person A described terrible violence suffered by concerned people, comprising electric shock torture, interrogation techniques, and violent assaults.

“There are cases of toddlers who have had their arms broken to try to get households to disclose hiding places,” she testified.