🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like much of our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.